Talk:Chlorine monofluoride

Latest comment: 10 months ago by NorbertMitzel in topic Structure

Infobox edit

Could someone help out with the infobox? Someone must have slipped an extra letter into it and now it's broken up 76.124.224.179 (talk) 20:17, 15 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chlorine monofluoride. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:12, 22 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Infobox SMILES edit

For me, the interactive image generates iron, sulfur, and hydrogen, even though it's just ClF. Is this the case for anyone else? For me, FCl, [Cl]F, Cl[F], and [Cl][F] work perfectly fine. Care to differ or discuss with me? The Nth User 00:27, 4 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Structure edit

I don't know where all this unreferenced structural information in Wikipedia comes from. Here, as in many other cases we see an number for a bond length in the first picture on the right side , but there is no source, no error and no phase of study and no physical method provided. Without such inform ation, the number is useless. I added ssound structural information to the text, but the picture should be changed. NorbertMitzel (talk) 12:59, 15 June 2023 (UTC)Reply