Talk:Chlorarachniophyte

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cyberbot II in topic External links modified

COMMENTS edit

Was the origin of the chlorarachniophyte chloroplast really from a euglenoid? This would imply that there was another symbiosis after the incorporation of a chlorophyte into a euglenoid. Was there not a common ancestor? The referenced article seems to imply so:

Rhizaria and Excavata (jointly cabozoa) are probably sisters if the formerly green algal plastid of euglenoids and chlorarachneans (Cercozoa) was enslaved in a single event in their common ancestor.

It also talks about how it can't be proven that there wasn't two independent symbiosis events; nowhere (that I can see) does it mention that euglenoid symbiosis was prior to a further chlorarachnian symbiosis. I think I'm going to remove this for just now until that's clarified.

- Dackerts (talk) 17:37, 11 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
Removing it is fine. You can also add it in as C-S's hypothesis if it is supported elsewhere and it's one where he hasn't changed it. --Kleopatra (talk) 18:14, 11 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Chlorarachniophyte. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:32, 28 February 2016 (UTC)Reply