Talk:Chiral knot

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Moved to "Chiral knot"

edit

I've moved Amphichiral knot here. Hopefully, nobody will mind. I tried to incorporate all the information from there in the present article.

  • I wish I could find more to say on the subsections about positive amphichiral etc...
  • I'm thinking about redirect Mirror image (knot theory) here. Any reasons why/not? Why there is no article on mirror image isotopes?
  • Surprisingly, there wasn't any OEIS sequence for just chiral knots, so I just added the subsets. As a further check, I subtracted it from the number of prime knots and got the number of amphichiral knots. So I'm 99.9718493856% certain its correct.
  • My sources differed on who discovered the 15-crossing amphichiral knot. (They both mentioned et al. however.) If you can clear this up, please do.

As always, feel free to improve this article in any way you can. Jkasd 22:49, 17 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Chiral knot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:59, 5 August 2017 (UTC)Reply