Talk:Chinese transport Fu Po

Latest comment: 5 years ago by QatarStarsLeague in topic GA Review


GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Chinese transport Fu Po/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Auntieruth55 (talk · contribs) 16:03, 21 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

I'll start this in a day or two.

tweaked a few points here Please review for clarity and to make sure sources line up. auntieruth (talk) 16:10, 22 June 2018 (UTC)Reply
Yes, no problems with that. QatarStarsLeague (talk) 03:41, 24 June 2018 (UTC)Reply
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail: