This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Eurovision, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Eurovision-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EurovisionWikipedia:WikiProject EurovisionTemplate:WikiProject EurovisionEurovision articles
Latest comment: 4 months ago3 comments3 people in discussion
Surely the phrase "state-owned propaganda machine" violates Wikipedia's policy for impartiality? LeetToTheBeatMakeItRoar (talk) 17:23, 30 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
Yes, but it appears there are WP:COI or basic troll farms or state paid propaganda actors of the U.S. government's defence dpartment or their paid think-tanks on here who are actively changing Wikipedia to have everything the U.S. government's talking points should be about foreign entities. CaribDigita (talk) 11:24, 9 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 4 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Ridiculous, e.g. non-neutral line. Had the head paragraph omited Propaganda outlet notion, the head paragraph would be concise to read. "State-owned media" should have been enough, but noooooo~ 2A00:1370:81A2:156:30F4:76F0:BD72:10BB (talk) 20:21, 7 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Could you restate what your specific issue is? CCTV is a media outlet, and one that distributes propaganda. I really don't see how that's "non-neutral". Remsense留 23:08, 7 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
.svg){kind=small}