Talk:China Can Say No

Title of book

• The title of the Chinese book (and of this Wiki article) is translated incorrectly. The Western media uses at least three different translation of the book title, making it extremely difficult to google the title.

  The correct, literal translation is "China Can Say No". It is simple, straightfoward, and one the most commonly used translations for the book. Therefore, we should use it. 22:34, 6 August 2005 User:Ktchong

Continued after cut-and-paste page move

• It was already debated on the old "The China That Can Say No" page and agreed that the new title of this page will be "China Can Say No" as this is the more literal and more accurate translation. Please stop changing it. --220.245.178.134 10:19, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
• While this may be irrelevant, where can I order this book from in Canada? I'd be interested in reading it. 23:16, 5 January 2007 [User:24.202.74.133]]

Broken Links

I've just removed the 'external links' section, because all the links in it were dead. Here's what they were, in case anybody more adventurous wants to track down linkable versions:

• China's Answer is Still No - analysis in Asiaweek
• Review Sinorama magazine
• 2nd review Sinorama —Preceding unsigned comment added by Danohuiginn (talk • contribs) 19:45, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

criticizes

It specifically criticizes physicist Fang Lizhi and journalist Liu Binyan.

Doesn't say why these in particular. RJFJR (talk) 13:47, 28 March 2008 (UTC)