Talk:Chima Simone
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hangon template
editI do not understand why everyone is in such a hurry to delete this article. There are probably thousands of articles about people who have done nothing other than have sex on camera, whose notability is not established beyond that dubious accomplishment. Simone is mentioned in various major news sources (ABC, NBC, etc). I think there is enough reason to warrant sending this to AFD. I just do not like how this has proceeded and do not understand the fervor with which people are setting about to stamp this article out. Where's the fire? Whatever404 (talk) 20:46, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
- Let me get this straight. You'd rather this article be speedy deleted, rather than redirected? That makes no sense. I'm not going to edit again, but this is ridiculous. Note that her agent, who has been creating this article, has been blocked for legal threats. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 20:46, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
- And since the author has been blocked, there's nobody to explain why the hangon should apply. Do you have any proof of notability? It should be a redirect, not a delete, but if the speedy delete applies, then fine, though I think it's wrong. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 20:48, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
- Unfortunately I have no more time right now; as there are no BLP violations at present I hope you will refrain from redirecting until we can discuss this. Thanks, Whatever404 (talk) 20:59, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
- She is a game show contestant that disobeyed rules. So what? I fail to see that as notability. Now if you excuse me, I will add the redirect again. –túrianpatois 21:07, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
- Unfortunately I have no more time right now; as there are no BLP violations at present I hope you will refrain from redirecting until we can discuss this. Thanks, Whatever404 (talk) 20:59, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
- And since the author has been blocked, there's nobody to explain why the hangon should apply. Do you have any proof of notability? It should be a redirect, not a delete, but if the speedy delete applies, then fine, though I think it's wrong. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 20:48, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
Sourced needed
editSourced are needed for the content that was removed in this edit series; please source this material if possible, for reinstatement. Whatever404 (talk) 20:56, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
Protected
editThis has been a massive edit war. Accordingly, work things out here because I have fully-protected the redirect. -MBK004 22:01, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
"Chima big brother" listed at Redirects for discussion
edit
The redirect Chima big brother has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 19 § Chima big brother until a consensus is reached. Kingsmasher678 (talk) 04:50, 19 September 2024 (UTC)