Talk:Chillingham cattle

Kudos!

This is a very high quality article on a very interesting subject. A true reflection of a well-researched article by an editor who cares about the subject. --Antorjal 13:34, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

In this sentence:

While it is likely there has been no addition of new blood since the Middle Ages, the total genetic isolation of the herd is documented for the last 300 years.

there is a link to the page for "blood". However, in THIS (cattle) entry, "blood" does not literally mean blood, but rather is used in its old meaning as a stand-in for "genetic material". I reckon the reference to "blood" is potentially confusing for some people.

Having said that, I will not be changing the main item, but suggest that for attention by the earlier editor.

thanks for the kind words. your point is well taken on the link to blood. i have edited it to take the link to heredity. cheers. Anlace 02:07, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Chillingham cattle/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Concise, well written, well referenced, informative

Substituted at 05:08, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chillingham cattle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110207071610/http://www.thecrownestate.co.uk/fochabers to http://www.thecrownestate.co.uk/fochabers

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:53, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chillingham cattle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090901172718/http://www.rbst.org.uk/watch-list/cattle/chillingam to http://www.rbst.org.uk/watch-list/cattle/chillingam

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:20, 25 May 2017 (UTC)