Talk:Chikmagalur

Requested move 2011

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus to move. Vegaswikian (talk) 07:25, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Chikmagalur → Chikkamagaluru — Procedural nom as denied G6. There appears to have been some previous discussion of this and given the name used on the city's website I think this is far from uncontroversial. G6 reason was "Chikkamagaluru is the actual name and the article should also be named the same". Dpmuk (talk) 13:51, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Oppose. There has been discussion here. There has been no subsequent order by the government of India regarding name change. Also, check out WP:GOOGLE and WP:COMMONNAME. TheMike •^{Wassup doc?} 13:59, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 18 October 2014

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the page at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 20:56, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

---

Chikmagalur → Chikkamagaluru – Govt. of India on 17-Oct-2014 cleared renaming 12 cities and towns of the Karnataka state, eight years after receiving a proposal from Karnataka government, Chikmagalur as Chikkamagaluru. (UTC) varma (talk) 11:25, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

• Oppose See Talk:Bangalore. WP:COMMONNAME. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 10:02, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
• Oppose Renamings take some time to catch on. Bobby Martnen (talk) 19:37, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Discussion

Any additional comments:

- varma (talk) 11:25, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move to correct name

From November 1 2014, 12 cities and district names were corrected including the chickkamagaluru, which was wrongly spelled in the English as chikmagalur and chickmagaluru. i request you to move this page chikkamagaluru. see WP:COMMONNAME which says " If the name of a person, group, object, or other article topic changes, then more weight should be given to the name used in reliable sources published after the name change than in those before the change". ಶಿವಕುಮಾರ್ ನಾಯಕ್ (talk) 04:20, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Reference

---

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chikmagalur. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070205083323/http://www.chickamagalurcity.gov.in:80/ to http://chickamagalurcity.gov.in

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:26, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Requested move 24 May 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Already moved Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:22, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

---

Chikkamagaluru. → Chikmagalur – There is a full stop in this article name that shouldn't be there. It should be moved to either Chikmagalur (commonly-used English name) or Chikkamagaluru (official name). It looks as though the 2014 discussions about moving from Chikmagalur to Chikkamagaluru didn't result in a consensus to move the page, but we may come up with a different answer today. I don't feel strongly either way. Tom Radulovich (talk) 16:18, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

• Support as per WP:COMMONNAME and the '.' must be removed as it makes no sense~Amkgp ✉ 05:31, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
• This page was moved twice. I've returned it to the original page title. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:01, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.