Talk:Chickaboom!/GA1

Latest comment: 9 months ago by Vaughan J. in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Vaughan J. (talk · contribs) 09:12, 20 July 2023 (UTC)Reply


GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):  
    b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a. (reference section):  
    b. (citations to reliable sources):  
    c. (OR):  
    d. (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a. (major aspects):  
    b. (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):  
    b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/fail:  

(Criteria marked   are unassessed)

I'm gonna try to complete this today! — VAUGHAN J. (TALK) 09:12, 20 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Infobox and lead edit

  • Infobox needs some changes:
  • Recorded – "The Lab, Auckland" → "The Lab (Auckland)", and this should be at the studio parameter instead, as the recorded parameter should include the dates of recording for this album per template.   Done by reviewer
  • Genre – Replace hlist with bullet points per template, and uncapitalise rockabilly   Done by reviewer
  • Label – Replace hlist with bullet points per template, "Neilson Records" → "Neilson (independent)", and wikilink Outside Music   Done by reviewer
  • Producer – Replace commas with bullet points per template   Done by reviewer
  • "released in February 2020." → "released on 14 February 2020, by Neilson Records and Outside Music." – you gotta mention the labels and the actual release date   Done
  • Pipe country to Country music   Done
  • I'd suggest mentioning that it debuted at number 8 on the Official New Zealand Music Chart. Don't source it as it is sourced in the charts section.   Done

Production edit

  • End image caption sentence with full stop.   Done
  • "the songs are inspired" → "the songs in the album are inspired"   Done
  • "sound of rockabilly" → "sound of rockabilly" per WP:OVERLINK   Done

Release and promotion edit

  • "released as the first single from" → "released as the lead single from"   Done
  • "In February 2021," → "On 19 February 2021,"   Done

Critical reception edit

  • Retitle to "Reception"   Done
  • Everything else looks good!

Track listing edit

  • Looks good!

Credits and personnel edit

Charts edit

  • Looks good!

Release history edit

  • "Neilson Records" → "Neilson (independent)"   Done
  • Remove Southband as it isn't a record label, it is a record store in NZ.   Done
  • Replace commas with hlist   Done
  • Capitalise "Digital download" in deluxe edition row   Done

References edit

  • Copyvio score – It looks pretty nice at 13%!
  • The reference list looks okay, but there are some changes needed:
  • Ref 1 – "New Album CHICKABOOM!" → "New Album Chickaboom!" per MOS:CAPS   Done
  • Ref 5 – Wikilink PopMatters.   Done
  • Ref 9 – "Forthcoming Album CHICKABOOM!" → "Forthcoming Album Chickaboom!" per MOS:CAPS   Done
  • Ref 11 – Wikilink PopMatters.   Done
  • Ref 14MOS:CAPS issue.   Done
  • Ref 15MOS:CAPS issue, wikilink Bandcamp, and make it as a publisher.   Done
  • Ref 18 – Wikilink Newshub.   Done
  • Ref 19 – Make CBC Music as a publisher.   Done

Final comments and verdict edit

  •   On hold until all of these issues are fixed; that was faster than I surprisingly expected! — VAUGHAN J. (TALK) 09:34, 20 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
    @Prosperosity: I see you haven't made any changes to this article, after almost 4 days of this review being on hold. — VAUGHAN J. (TALK) 01:34, 23 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
    @Vaughan J.: My apologies, I'll make the changes asap. --Prosperosity (talk) 01:41, 23 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
    @Vaughan J.: Done! Thank you so much for reviewing the page. --Prosperosity (talk) 01:53, 23 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
      Pass now; no worries! Now the article looks way better than it was before! Amazing job! — VAUGHAN J. (TALK) 01:59, 23 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.