Talk:Chicano rock/Archive 1

Archive 1

This article is pure sh**

Please, stop writing this misleading crap, Chicano Rock, Latino Rock... You guys should pay more respect to the Rock made in Latin America--129.102.254.253 (talk) 14:16, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Idiotic Title

"Brown-eyed soul?" First, ALL peoples are known to have brown eyes so how does this become exclusive to those who speak Spanish? Second, most of the artists mentioned do not do anything even remotely related to R&B. An any Puerto-Rican or Dominican artist would just be black anyway. The things people come up with just to be different... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.28.93.188 (talk) 05:30, 23 May 2008 (UTC) UPDATE: I was redirected here from a link called brown-eyed soul. After reading the actul article and seeing the title, Chicano Rock makes more sense and is more valid than something called "brown-eyed soul." My mistake.

References

I changed the last paragraph on references into a sub-section with bibliographic formatting. I also added a reference. I realize the book is in Spanish, but it is an excellent resource (depite its lacking an index).--Rockero 21:33, 28 October 2005 (UTC) Also many researcher on this topic probably speak Spanish.--Rockero 08:16, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

AVANDARO BANDS?

Mexican Rock and Rock Chicano 70ts?.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 148.206.91.131 (talk) 22:31, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Merge

These two articles really belong together. --evrik 00:04, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

• When I hear "Latin rock", I think of the rock produced in Latin America, not of the rock produced by Latinos in the United States. At least for the most part. If anything, Latin rock should probably be merged with Spanish language rock and roll.--Rockero 02:28, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Well, maybe we should rewrite Latino Rock to include references to Chicano rock. --evrik 02:29, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
    • I just searched the web and the library catalogs for "Latin rock", since besides being a stub, the LR article is also unsourced. In the literature, the term is used either for both Rock en Español in general or for U.S. rock by Latinos, regardless of the language. In the latter sense, Chicano rock would be a major component of "Latin rock", but would not encompass it entirely. So maybe the Latin rock article should be made into a disambiguation page and a new, Latin rock in the United States article should be made?--Rockero 03:04, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
• I think we should flesh out the one that exist and then have a subsection thta then points to Chicano rock. --evrik 19:50, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

The Rock en español section should be the one used. It already points to Chicano rock. Latin rock and Rock en español refer to exactly the same thing. Windexwindex (talk) 08:41, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Chicano = Mexican = Latin

The puerto rican band Puya recorded the album Fundamental on 1999 on Florida, US and get success on the Ozzfest. They are not latin rock??

The argentinean band Fabulosos Cadillacs won a Grammy for Best Latin Rock on 1998. And why they can not be part of this article??? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 190.43.29.24 (talk) 23:25:57, August 18, 2007 (UTC)

The bands you cited are not Chicanos, as in Chicano = Mexican-Americans. Chicano rock specifically and only references bands that are started by Mexican-Americans or Mexicans living in America. Some would say there is a specifically LA/California-centricness to the term Chicano, as it isn't really used by a Mexican-American living on the East Coast. hope that helps Kitten b 05:18, 2 September 2007 (UTC)kitten b

That's what i'm saying. Chicano rock is not latin rock, why is the same article? --190.40.64.4 23:18, 13 September 2007 (UTC) So... now latin is synonim of mexican?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.24.92.160 (talk • contribs)

Latin Rock should not automatically redirect to Chicano Rock. Chicano Rock could be considered a part of Latin Rock, also known as Rock en español, in which Chicano Rock is listed. Windexwindex (talk) 01:46, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Agreed that Chicano rock does not equal Latin soul. Therefore, I removed the redirect from Latin soul to this article. Dogru144 (talk) 02:24, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Stupide Bot notices

Fair use rationale for Image:Cruzados.jpg

Image:Cruzados.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:35, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Howwillthewolfsurvive.jpg

Image:Howwillthewolfsurvive.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:48, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:RageAgainsttheMachineRageAgainsttheMachine.jpg

Image:RageAgainsttheMachineRageAgainsttheMachine.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 02:35, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Ellay.jpg

Image:Ellay.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:58, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Ritchie Valens album cover3.jpg

The image Image:Ritchie Valens album cover3.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
• That this article is linked to from the image description page.

The following images also have this problem:

• Image:The Champs.png

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --21:36, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Reversion of SamChambers Deletion

Before deleting the Renegade content again, please request a discussion to debate whether a YouTube video of a platinum record event constitutes a valid source. In addition, you deleted the entire section which had separate references. A YouTube video that literally documents the event is different from some self promoted video that is published by the source. In this case, a video documenting a platinum record presentation ceremony, hosted by David Hasselhoff and sponsored by the record label at an established venue is a valid source, as it proves the legitimacy of the article's assertion. Your cooperation would be appreciated and reciprocated by all. --TechnicalExcellence (talk) 03:07, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

• http://musicouch.com/genres/rock/thee-midniters-chicano-rock-bands/

  Triggered by \bmusicouch\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 15:42, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

This article shouldn't be merged with Latin rock or Rock en español

Chicano rock is just any kind of rock (so it's not the same as the subgenre latin rock) performed by Americans of Mexican descent, not necessarily in Spanish (so it's not the same as Rock en español). Chicano rock actually is within the scope of American rock .--Batamamma ^(talk) 17:13, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chicano rock. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927203934/http://www.presstelegram.com/passages/ci_4371644 to http://www.presstelegram.com/passages/ci_4371644

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:15, 21 November 2016 (UTC)