Talk:Chicago (poem)

[Untitled]

from VfD:

School essay. Original research? Mikkalai 06:16, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)

• I'd venture "unoriginal research", but yes, delete --fvw* 06:38, 2004 Dec 17 (UTC)
• Delete. Original poem analysis. Not encyclopedic. jni 07:01, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Not an encyclopaedia article. P Ingerson 08:25, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Original poem analysis. Not an encyclopaedia article. [[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm|^(talk)]] 08:48, Dec 17, 2004 (UTC)
• Assuming it's not a copyvio, keep and move to Chicago (poem). Very notable. Everyking 09:54, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • I agree with Everyking. Cleanup, encyclopedicize and move to Chicago (poem). Samaritan 10:14, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep, move, and cleanup. The poem is worthy of an article. This analysis needs major cleanup, but it may be helpful to a future editor. -- Smerdis of Tlön 16:24, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Just someone's reaction to a poem--not encyclopedic. Niteowlneils 16:33, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Merge, crummy essay, it's ok now, but one of the two articles has to go. Wyss 23:38, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • I have rewritten the page and moved it to Chicago (poem). -- Smerdis of Tlön 17:02, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)
    • Woohoo! Thank you. Samaritan 19:15, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• keep' Yuckfoo 04:54, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)

end moved discussion

Copyvio

being that this was written less that 100 years ago, are we sure this is not copyrighted? I'm going to investigate. AdamBiswanger1 16:50, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Because it was published in the U.S. before 1923, that's why... AnonMoos 00:42, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Poem deleted

As per WP:NOFULLTEXT, the poem has been removed from the article. The text is available via an external link, JSTOR's freely accessible link to the now-public-domain source. It's also suitable for Wikisource, if someone wants to put it there. (Note that the original markup using br-tags was clumsy: see the use of the poem-tag in Fog (poem).) Choor monster (talk) 20:23, 18 April 2013 (UTC)