Talk:Chiara Marletto

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Women in Red: #1day1woman (2021)

This article was created or improved during the #1day1woman initiative hosted by the Women in Red project in 2021. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Physics: Biographies Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Biographies Taskforce.

Women scientists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comment: Only one paper with over 100 citationsi n Gogle Scholar,; this probably does not meet our notability requirement for showing hte influence of her work. DGG ( talk ) 04:15, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

Comment: Fails WP:NSCHOLAR Dan arndt (talk) 04:11, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- No. WP:NSCHOLAR states "Criterion 1 can also be satisfied if the person has pioneered or developed a significant new concept, technique or idea…" Citations 4–6 suppoprt the assertion that Marletto and Deutsch are the pioneers "in the field of constructor theory" which article in turn also supports that point. If we want an article on constructor theory—and unlike in 2016 no one is currently contending that we do not—the pioneers of that theory are Marletto and Deutsch, who thus qualify (the latter multiple times over; Deutsch is admittedly more notable than Marletto, and also older). (See also WP:NAUTHOR point 2.) Additionally, "Criterion 7 may be satisfied, for example, if the person is frequently quoted in conventional media as an academic expert in a particular area." See 2690 results in Google news search, as well as 300+ individual and panel interviews on YouTube channels other than her own. Note also that Google Scholar fails WP:RS for use in citation metrics per WP:NSCHOLAR#Citation metrics. All that said, the article is still a stub and could use significant additional work to more clearly demonstrate notability and impact; stub-class, however, is not an indication of non-notability. —KGF0 ( T | C ) 21:51, 8 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic