Talk:Chi Mak

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Are Works Of Fiction Reliable Citation?

edit

Propose to remove Snake Fish reference, based on the fact the book is categorized as *fiction*:

http://books.google.com/books?id=8WBbPSfFXqIC&dq=Snake+Fish&source=gbs_navlinks_s

Even if there's disagreement or controversy over this citation, since Chi Mak is a living person, what is Wikipedia's rule on benefit of doubt regarding living person? Bobby fletcher (talk) 17:15, 29 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

If there's no objection I'm going to remove the reference.
Bobby fletcher (talk) 21:50, 9 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Propose to add this New American Media article Where Chi Mak case is referenced

edit

"Warning to Chinese Americans: FBI Still Obsessed With Chinese-American ‘Spies’" http://news.newamericamedia.org/news/view_article.html?article_id=2df3976fc5cc152e75b1ee75e0270f91

Verdict on the citation-free paragraph?

edit

The paragraph about all the technologies Mak has allegedly transferred to the PRC is neither cited nor supported by any of the other sources in the article. Time to delete?

98.150.246.242 (talk) 23:37, 29 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Chinese spy?

edit

explain to me how he's a Chinese spy if he is a naturalised american citizen? any Chinaman who applies for american citizenship automatically will lose his Chinese citizenship. thats the law. — Preceding unsigned comment added by F3432432432423 (talkcontribs) 15:25, 4 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chi Mak. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:04, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Chi Mak. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:45, 4 August 2017 (UTC)Reply