Talk:Chhattisgarh Police

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

PoV and CoI editing, Copyvio edit

This page seems to have been written in violation of WP: CoI and contains many PoV edits.
-- A Twitter account that logs anonymous edits made from IP addresses belonging to the Government of India has traced some of the CoI edits: https://twitter.com/AnonGoIWPEdits/status/653839806909284352 https://twitter.com/AnonGoIWPEdits/status/653838795297714176
-- Some of the content of this article is promotional in nature. (About Us section, names of several officers without citations with PoV descriptions.) -- Rohini (talk) 20:34, 15 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

This is also a copyright violation: http://www.cgpolice.gov.in/about-us -- Rohini (talk) 20:44, 15 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Copyright problem removed edit

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.cgpolice.gov.in/about-us. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:30, 27 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Revdel on non-copyvio edits edit

I had reported copyright violation for this article here on the Talk page and on the copyvio noticeboard. I find that @Justlettersandnumbers: has rev deleted my legit (non-copyvio) edits in a way that the content of the edits stays but they show up as deleted edits in the article history and in my contributs. Inter alia, this could show me in poor light as an editor. I will assume WP:AGF and request you to reverse the revdel on edits with non-copyright content.

Also tagging @Diannaa:. -- Rohini (talk) 08:11, 23 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Rohini, through no fault of yours, your edits were made to the page while it contained copyright-violating material. I asked for those edits to be hidden (not deleted) for that reason, but that doesn't in any way reflect on you as an editor – it's perfectly clear from the history, even in its greyed-out form, that the offending material was added by IP 164.100.131.5 and not by you. On the contrary, you deserve credit and thanks for noticing the copyvio and getting it dealt with. Thank you! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:35, 23 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
Rohini, unfortunately there's no way of hiding the copyright violations without hiding the intervening edits. This is not meant to reflect poorly on your own reputation. Thanks for your help with copyright clean-up. -- Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:30, 23 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
Heya @Rohini:, if you're upto it, I don't mind helping you in rebuilding the article. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 13:02, 25 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Chhattisgarh Police. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:05, 25 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Chhattisgarh Police. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:24, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply