Talk:Chetumal Province

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Asdfjrjjj in topic Overlap with Chetumal and Santa Rita, Corozal

Overlap with Chetumal and Santa Rita, Corozal

edit

@Robert McClenon and Sahaib3005: Hi! You've both pointed out that the content in this draft should be routed to the Chetumal or the Santa Rita, Corozal pages. But–

  1. this draft is an article about a Mayan province in existence circa 900 to 1544 AD,
  2. the Chetumal page is an article about a present-day Mexican city established in 1898 (though it is named after the capital of the province covered by this draft, and it does sit on land which used to belong to the province covered by this draft),
  3. the Santa Rita, Corozal page is an article about a present-day Belizean archaeological site, (re)discovered circa 1894, which has been proposed but not yet broadly accepted as the site of the capital of the province covered by this draft.

Given this, I'm having a hard time seeing how the content of this draft would fit into the suggested pages? They all seem to deal with separate subjects to me? But I'm new here so if you guys agree I'll add the content to the agreed upon page and cite you guys (in the appropriate Talk page) regarding the propriety of the content addition. I'd appreciate it! Ps. Almost every other Postclassic (c. 900 to 1500) Mayan state in the Yucatan peninsula has a dedicated Wikipedia article (eg Ekab, Chakan Putum, Ah Canul, Ceh Pech, Tutul-Xiu, Sotuta, Chakan, Ah Kin Chel, Cupul, Chikinchel, Uaymil, Cochuah, Can Pech. Their existence is the reason I thought it proper to create a draft for the Chetumal Province! Asdfjrjjj (talk) 11:31, 14 August 2021 (UTC) AsdfjrjjjReply

User:Asdfjrjjj, User:Sahaib3005 - I have renamed this draft to Chetumal Province. Does this largely address the overlap by defining three distinct articles? Robert McClenon (talk) 02:09, 15 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
Sweet! I should think this addresses the overlap but will wait to hear from User:Sahaib3005 :) Asdfjrjjj (talk) 02:49, 15 August 2021 (UTC) AsdfjrjjjReply
User:Asdfjrjjj, I think the new name is better, because it distinguishes it from the other page. If you think the page is ready, you could resubmit.Sahaib3005 (talk) 07:05, 15 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
Will do, thanks! Asdfjrjjj (talk) 18:29, 15 August 2021 (UTC) AsdfjrjjjReply