Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment edit

  This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Emilyn3.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 17:20, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Untitled edit

I was thinking it may be a good idea to add in more information about the American Chestnut Foundation's work, where some other hybrids are planted (like on the Flight 93 National Memorial site), and maybe discuss more about how the fungus affects other hardwood species. Emilyn3 (talk) 22:53, 14 October 2016 (UTC)emilyn3Reply

Untitled edit

I was reading about the Chestnut blight, and noticed that this page and the American Chestnut page seem to have different sets of information regarding the Chestnut blight. Perhaps these two pages should be merged together, or the American Chestnut page merely point to this page? Dandube 22:55, 2 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

Blight resistant breeding program a success edit

Read here: http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2011/01/30/american_chestnut_tree_grows_ready_for_a_comeback/

Tweedledee2011 (talk) 17:50, 30 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Dunstan / Chestnut Hills Nursery spam edit

I have removed[1] the following paragraph of text from the article, where it has been retained essentially unchanged for six years since being added early 2010[2]). Efforts by me to verify the existence of the allegedly totally immune tree allegedly discovered by James Carpenter, "...a member of the Northern Nut Growers Association" have failed. On the nursery's webpage,[3] it claims this Mr. Carpenter failed to infect the tree despite numerous attempt at applying the fungus. (Truly this would be the "unicorn tree" preservationists have been seeking for a century.) I can find no scientific literature regarding this tree, and in response to my inquiries to the nursery, they claim that both Mr. Carpenter and his perfect ancestor tree are now deceased, and have no further information.

Given the apparent commercial conflict of interest in both the purportedly once-existent Mr. Carpenter and the nursery, I am concluding that this is unverifiable spam and striking the passage. I have, at this point, no reason to believe that the nursery's trees are substantially different than various other Chinese hybrid strains capable of achieving moderate heights, as the advertized growth characteristics do not suggest that they have successfully recreated the once-dominant apex canopy tree.--Froglich (talk) 21:23, 22 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

In the years since the chestnut blight, many scientists and botanists have worked to create a resistant hybrid chestnut tree that retains the main characteristics of the American chestnut tree. In the early 1950s, James Carpenter discovered a large living American chestnut in a grove of dead and dying trees in Salem, Ohio that showed no evidence of blight infection. Carpenter sent budwood to Dr. Robert T. Dunstan, a plant breeder in Greensboro, North Carolina. Dunstan grafted the scions onto chestnut rootstock and the trees grew well. He cross-pollinated one with a mixture of 3 Chinese chestnut selections: "Kuling," "Meiling," and "Nanking." The resulting fruit-producing hybrid was named the Dunstan chestnut. The grafted Dunstan hybrids grew to a height of only 25 feet or 7.6 meters, but the seedling Dunstan chestnuts grow 50-60' tall, in many locations around the nation.

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Chestnut blight. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:28, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

US Prospective edit

I have added this tag as I feel this article primarily deals with the pest from the US prospective, despite it also being an issue in Europe, with quite a lot of coverage for the UK for example. I will try to improve the article myself with more information on the pest from a European prospective, but have quite the backlog, so popped up the tab incase other editors are willing to help. Million_Moments (talk) 11:04, 20 June 2018 (UTC)Reply