This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neopaganism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neopaganism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeopaganismWikipedia:WikiProject NeopaganismTemplate:WikiProject NeopaganismNeopaganism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The statement in this section, "Cherry Hill Seminary has been granted an official exemption from South Carolina requirements for educational institutions..." has been tagged for citation. Although the following does not qualify as such, I am adding it in this discussion to provide supporting documents for the process, if not the claim of official exemption. The State of South Carolina does, in fact, provide exemptions to the licensing requirement for religious institutions (see "Explanation of Exemption for Institutions Whose Sole Purpose is Religious or Theological Training" [1]. The PDF that can be found there references Code Section 59-58-30(4) Exclusions, and spells out precisely how one applies for one. Cherry Hill Seminary has stated[2] that they have applied for, and have been granted an exemption, but neither the state's website, nor Cherry Hill's, provide any support for the claim, yet. - Bobjameswi (talk) 21:06, 27 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
