A fact from Cherhill White Horse appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 22 July 2008, and was viewed approximately 0 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wiltshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wiltshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WiltshireWikipedia:WikiProject WiltshireTemplate:WikiProject WiltshireWiltshire articles
Ah, but "...the second oldest of several similar white horses to be seen around Wiltshire..." Uffington's in Berkshire. But I agree we should work in the really old horse here somewhere. Xn4 (talk) 01:40, 19 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
...as with many quibbles, this one leaves the reader with a misleading image. Perhaps the wording could be improved. --Wetman (talk) 00:02, 22 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
I see what you mean. Is that better? Xn4 (talk) 01:14, 22 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Found this on the front page with the black and white image pictured. Isn't the other picture more appropriate? the B&W seems to be an obvious facsimile and not of good quality (as typeface from the opposing page is visible.) --CancelHoo72 (talk) 22:02, 21 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
I'm not sure the photograph works better at that scale, see this. Xn4 (talk) 01:40, 22 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
