This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Just after the indented quote in the Legacy section, in the paragraph beginning with "While Chinese historians may quibble...", I have identified two interrelated issues relating to Wikipedia's neutral point of view (NPOV) policies.
The two statements in question are "...it appears to be quite correct" and "he should not be viewed as a hero". These statements are clearly matters of opinion, but they are presented in this section as if they are empirical facts. If these statements are to remain in some form, the positions must be attributed to a relevant source or sources (this paragraph contains no citations at all, as has been flagged by myself and by another previous editor).