Talk:Chelodina

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chelodina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101231195838/http://www.chelodina.com/9.htm to http://www.chelodina.com/9.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:31, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Updating the species list

I've started updating the species list to be a bit more informative. Right now it looks like a good start, but does anyone know how to make consistent nice looking range maps that many species have? This would make the list look quite a bit nicer. Mattximus (talk) 23:13, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

I just removed that column, it didn't look that nice. I think this format is simpler, contains all the information from before, but now includes images and IUCN redlist info.Mattximus (talk) 18:05, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Some of those taxa are fossil species, a hobby horse of mine, but not extinct per the IUCN. cygnis insignis 18:51, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

You must have thought the same thing :) I'm in two minds about whether to mention some available names, Hoser's taxa, a secondary ref might not be polite in their opinion. cygnis insignis 19:11, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Yep I noticed that and made the change. I did a bit of research but I just wanted to give this page a more friendly format. I tried very hard to keep all contributions intact and not delete any information, just arrange it in a nicer format. Mattximus (talk) 21:50, 28 May 2019 (UTC)