Talk:Chef & Brewer

Notability

The subject completely fails to meet any of the criteria of WP:GNG or WP:CORP and hence needs to be deleted. Jezhotwells (talk) 12:52, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

This pub company has been in the papers almost constantly since the end of last year, as part of the biggest pub / restaurant business in the UK employing 17,000 people with various big restructuring plans - why is that not of interest? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Creativecog (talk • contribs) 13:42, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

To quote WP:CORP:

An organization is generally considered notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not sufficient to establish notability. All content must be verifiable. If no independent, third-party, reliable sources can be found on a topic, then Wikipedia should not have an article on it.

You need to find the significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources and then get some information extracted from there into the article.

Chef & Brewer is a chain of around 127 licensed traditional pub restaurants in the United Kingdom, owned by Punch Taverns. They are known for serving traditional pub food, including Sunday lunch, pies, cod & chips and steaks which are among the most popular choices.

Following the merger of Grand Met and Guinness, to form Diageo in 1991, Chef & Brewer pubs were bought by Scottish & Newcastle in 1993 in a part cash, part debentures deal of £708 million. In 2003, Scottish & Newcastle auctioned off the Chef & Brewer chain, which was acquired by the Spirit Group. In 2005 the Spirit Group was acquired by Punch Taverns.

There is nothing notable there. Jezhotwells (talk) 14:09, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

It's notable enough to warrant a short article. It stinks of corporate PR at present though. --Ef80 (talk) 17:20, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Chef & Brewer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120414222723/http://www.ashfield-dc.gov.uk/ccm/navigation/leisure-and-culture/tourism-and-heritage/hidden-valleys/annesley-and-ravenshead/;jsessionid=56C021CE17503096AF63D99AF0F85414 to http://www.ashfield-dc.gov.uk/ccm/navigation/leisure-and-culture/tourism-and-heritage/hidden-valleys/annesley-and-ravenshead/;jsessionid=56C021CE17503096AF63D99AF0F85414
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110317101226/http://www.expressandstar.com:80/lifestyle/food/2011/03/07/food-review-of-nags-head-burntwood-ws7-9ha/ to http://www.expressandstar.com/lifestyle/food/2011/03/07/food-review-of-nags-head-burntwood-ws7-9ha/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:01, 21 November 2016 (UTC)