Talk:Cheek v. United States

Latest comment: 18 years ago by Famspear in topic Two separate holdings

Untitled

edit

Redirects needed

Cheek v. U.S. Cheek v. US 498 U.S. 192 498 US 192

Two separate holdings

edit

I have elaborated on the holdings in this case in the article. The Court made a very distinct differentiation between arguments about constitutionality and all other arguments, resulting in two separate holdings. Yours, Famspear 22:21, 25 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Scalia's concurring opinion?

edit

Perhaps someone with more credibility on this site than myself would be willing to add a section discussing Justice Scalia's concerns mentioned in his concurring opinion. He agreed with the holding, but disagreed rather strongly about the disallowance of the constitutionality arguments.