Talk:Checkmate (1911 film)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: The Almightey Drill (talk · contribs) 07:14, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

I will review this. '''tAD''' (talk) 07:14, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

1. It is well-written. Minor copy-edit done, nothing incredibly serious
2. It is verified. The plot has sources because the film is lost. Nothing is outlandish and claimed without source, nor is there original research. Analysis is taken from a historian
3. It is broad in its coverage inasmuch as can be for a lost film. These articles do not to be long, only fitting into criteria. The quality and scope of the article is not dissimilar to How Brown Saw the Baseball Game, a Featured Article
4. No hard bias comes out from this article, it admits to the spectrum of views by contemporary critics. It would be ideal to include opponents of the Lonergan authorship hypothesis, but I admit that it is a) very likely he wrote it and b) there are few notable scholars on such a subject
5. Stability is no problem
6. Images are relevant, as are their captions. Both are public domain from being over a century old. I added an image of the only known credited person, which I believe to be entirely relevant to our imagination of a lost film.

As you can see, we have a pass '''tAD''' (talk) 07:36, 3 September 2015 (UTC)