Talk:Chauchilla Cemetery

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

600 years? edit

The cemetary was established around 200 ad, and has not been used since 9th? That is either "ca. 700 years" or "almost 700 years," if I am not mistaken. Can someone explain the reasoning or create some more accurate wording? SADADS (talk) 14:26, 31 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

The 9th century began in the year 800 A.D. (or more precisely, 801, as we were told at the turn of the millenium). Thus (800 - 200) = 600. Boneyard90 (talk) 09:45, 10 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Is this article too scary? edit

Yikes! I saw it on the main page.--Appletartgame (talk) 16:22, 31 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chauchilla Cemetery. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:19, 20 November 2016 (UTC)Reply