Talk:Chau Say Tevoda

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Nvvchar in topic GA Review


GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Chau Say Tevoda/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 04:52, 29 June 2016 (UTC)Reply


Hi, I will be reviewing this. Sainsf (talk · contribs) 04:52, 29 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

General
  • No copyvio/external link trouble
  • Dablink: Nagas
    • Done
  • Use italics for non-English terms
    • Done wherever required. Wikilinked names are not given in italics
Lead
  • pre – dates the former and post – dates Use hyphens not spaced endashes
    • Done
  • mid – 12th century hyphen not spaced endash
    • Done
  • 2000 – 2009 Unspaced endash not spaced endash (also in History)
    • Done
History
  • built in the 12th century In the lead you said "mid-12th"
    • Chnaged
  • Further supplementation of structures were done "was", not "were"
  • Yes, done
Features
  • Many of the sculptures are in a fairly good condition and are of Vishnu Change to "Many of the sculptures depict Vishnu, and are in a fairly good condition"
    • Better wording. Done
  • Nature has contributed to further deterioration resulting from the collapse of the ceiling Not sure what it means. If I am right this should be rephrased to "With time the ceiling has collapsed and led to further deterioration"
    • Replaced as suggested
  • The Chau Say Tevoda was in a dilapidated state Simply say "The temple was...."
    • Done
  • Thanks for the review. I have addressed all review comments. Please see if I need to address any more issues. Nvvchar. 05:58, 29 June 2016 (UTC)Reply