Talk:Charlie Bone and the Wilderness Wolf

Latest comment: 14 years ago by 98.248.32.44 in topic AFD rationale


Dagobert's Power edit

I think Dagobert Endless is the photo traveler that will help Ezekial with his plan.GoldenIrish 23:00, 24 April 2007 (UTC) Dagbert Endless endowment (power)is drowning.Charlie Bone the main character of the book endowment is picture traveling.Dagbert Endless came to Bloor's Academy to take down Charlie Bone. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.8.76.29 (talk) 02:05, 14 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Deprodded edit

I've deprodded this; as some of the other books in this series have their own pages and the others are likely to get them, I don't feel this page is any less appropriate than Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows.iridescent (talk to me!) 22:20, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Release date edit

The June release dates are incorrect. I just got my copy of Charlie Bone and the Beast today in the US. Can somebody find out what the real dates were?65.34.13.144 18:44, 24 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Description of amazon.com.uk edit

I don't think that it is appropriate for a description posted on another website to be put on a Wikipedia page. Is it against copyright restrictions? Also, a description by Amazon is like an advertisement, and a Wiki article isn't supposed to be like that. I suggest the section "description by amazon.com.uk" be deleted. SUPERBEES Talk 04:25, 19 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

I have no idea where the Plot Summary came from Amazon or otherwise but it is not a Plot Summary, it is a sales teaser. Thoughts? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.242.159.56 (talk) 14:19, 13 July 2008 (UTC)Reply


The Title edit

I heard that "Charlie Bone and the Beast" is the American title of the book. If the book was originally published in the United Kingdom, why can't the article's title be the UK title, "Charlie Bone and the Wilderness Wolf"? SUPERBEES Talk 04:30, 19 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

AFD rationale edit

The article shows nothing that indicates this novel meets the notability criteria - no reviews, no third-party references, no awards, and the author doesn't appear to be historically significant. 98.248.32.44 (talk) 02:06, 17 January 2010 (UTC)Reply