Talk:Charleston Collegiate School

Assessment

I have assessed this article for class and importance. The feedback is as follows: Much more ....—Preceding unsigned comment added by Victuallers (talk • contribs)

File:Painting of Charleston Collegiate School.tif Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Painting of Charleston Collegiate School.tif, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Painting of Charleston Collegiate School.tif) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 23:34, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Exhibition of mastery

This material; why should it be in here? It's unsourced, promotional, and gives undue weight to irrelevant material about the school.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 15:46, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

List of programs in the lead section

This material, why should it be in the lead paragraph? It doesn't summarize anything in the body per WP:LEAD. It's also unsourced and completely irrelevant. This article is not an advertising brochure for the school.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 15:47, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

List of faculty

List of faculty; why? It's not relevant to the topic of the school. These are non-notable individuals.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 15:48, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Traditions

Traditions; why should this unsourced material be included? There's no mention of it anywhere in reliable sources, there are no descriptions of these traditions anywhere; this is not a school brochure.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 15:49, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

List of facilities

List of facilities; they have a 1 mile nature trail? Lovely. What does it have to do with anything? Is it discussed in reliable sources? Why should any of this be in here?— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 15:51, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Segregation academy

Sourced material removed, why? This is sourced from a reliable source. There's no reason to remove it. It's practically the only salient fact about this school. When it's discussed in reliable sources it's because it was founded as a seg academy. It's not OK to remove sourced material without discussion on the talk page. Please discuss.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 15:55, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

copyright violation reinserted

This "When the school first opened classes were held in a local Episcopal church. In 1971 Sea Island Academy merged with Sea Island Baptist School, founded in 1966 by the First Baptist Church of John's Island." is plagiarism straight from the source cited, reinserted by Jeanniehwilson with no explanation. Thoughts?— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 15:44, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Unexplained removal of author from citation

Here Jeanniehwilson removes the name of the author of a source with no explanation. What possible reason is there to do this?— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 15:45, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Removal of sourced info about scholarship program

Here Jeanniehwilson removes sourced information about the school's scholarship program, started to attract minority students. Why?— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 15:46, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

How many students go to college

Here the sourced fact that 100% of the graduates are accepted for postsecondary ed is removed with no explanation. Why?— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 15:47, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Charleston Collegiate School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111215003721/http://www.charlestoncollegiate.org/about/accred to http://www.charlestoncollegiate.org/about/accred

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:53, 3 August 2017 (UTC)