Talk:Charles Vane

Latest comment: 7 years ago by 152.133.6.133 in topic Untitled

Untitled edit

The articles says: "Vane's final blow came after his ship was wrecked in a storm in February 1719 and he and one other survivor were washed up on a humanless island in the Bay of Honduras". This makes me rather curious who the other survivor was. Also, wouldn't 'uninhabited' be a more appropriate word than 'humanless'? Junuxx 13:29, 7 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

The only reason humanless is in the article is that, it was written in the article from the "Pirate" book. Feel free to change it if you want, uninhabited sounds better. Rutke421 12:57, 8 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

I like humanless it sounds how they spoke back in those times. Earthgodess53 (talk) 21:47, 2 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

I'm also curious about who the second surviving person was with Vane. Earthgodess53 (talk) 21:49, 2 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

"In February, Vane sailed from Barnacko, in order for a Cruize; but some Days after he was out, a violent Turnado overtook him, which separated him from his Consort, and after two Days Distress, threw his Sloop upon a small uninhabited Island, near the Bay of Honduras, where she was staved to Pieces, and most of her Men drowned: Vane himself was saved, but reduced to great Streights, for want of Necessaries, having no Opportunity to get any Thing from the Wreck." A General History of the Pyrates by Captain Charles Johnson. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.133.6.133 (talk) 10:50, 17 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Popular Culture Section edit

These are generally frowned upon for historical figures and I'm not sure it helps the article. Also, is popular culture a byword for TV/video games, because what about Vane's prominent featuring in Woodard's Pirate Republic? I'm leaning toward scrapping the section. I don't want to dump on anyone's hard work, what do you all think? The Cap'n (talk) 07:42, 13 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment edit

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Charles Vane/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

This page on Charles Vane contains information about the takeover of his ship by Calico Jack Rackham which is contradictory to the information held on the stub about Calico Jack I do not know which version is correct but one or other stub needs changing

Last edited at 08:39, 18 September 2006 (UTC). Substituted at 11:21, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed edit

  Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: David Pickering (2006). Pirates: From corsairs and cutlasses to parrots and planks. London: Collins. (a book for children). Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:25, 2 February 2017 (UTC)Reply