Talk:Charles/MGH station/GA1

Latest comment: 3 years ago by ArnabSaha in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: ArnabSaha (talk · contribs) 06:42, 12 October 2020 (UTC)Reply


GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it well written?
    A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:  
    B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:  
  2. Is it verifiable with no original research?
    A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:  
    B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:  
    C. It contains no original research:  
    D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:  
    B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):  
  4. Is it neutral?
    It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:  
  5. Is it stable?
    It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:  
  6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:  
    B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  

Comments edit

  • "Three southbound trains collided inside the Beacon Hill Tunnel just south of the station on August 1, 1975, injuring 132 passengers." - this doesn't fit in 'Modifications'.  Saha ❯❯❯ Stay safe  07:57, 15 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
    • Unfortunately, there's no better place to put it, as the history is more or less chronological. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 16:53, 15 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
      • Any modifications made after this? Also, one thing can be done, making a separate section 'Incidents' and describing it as the incident seems serious. (mainly suggested by epicgenius in discord)  Saha ❯❯❯ Stay safe  15:25, 16 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
        • I've adjusted the section title to mention the MBTA, as I don't think a separate heading is needed for a one-line summary of that collision. Does that work? Pi.1415926535 (talk) 17:13, 16 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
          • Yes, it's better now.  Saha ❯❯❯ Stay safe  05:26, 17 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • If possible, rewrite them "...replaced the BERy in 1947. In 1965, the MBTA designed..." as the years, 1965 is right after 1947.  Saha ❯❯❯ Stay safe  12:42, 16 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
    •   Done