Talk:Chapel of Saint Helena, Jerusalem

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Tiptoethrutheminefield in topic Floor mosaic

Merger proposal

edit

This should be merged to Church of the Holy Sepulcher. It won't add excessive weight to that page. --Sreifa (talk) 06:12, 11 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

I agree it should definitely be merged for both of the above reasons. the place is so very special and is almost ignored by visitors who do not understand its importance. merging would allow users to explore the church more thoroughly and understand why the chapel is there. -- User:pilgrim 08:40 28 November 2010 GMT —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.104.45.195 (talk) 08:41, 28 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

That makes no sense. You can simply edit the Church of the Holy Sepulcher if that's the aim. You don't need to lose an article on an historically important chapel. JASpencer (talk) 13:55, 3 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
this chapel is IN the Church of the Holy Sepulcher.--Sreifa (talk) 11:05, 13 February 2011 (UTC)Reply
The church of the Holy Sepulcher is IN Jerusalem, but it makes no sense to merge those two articles. JASpencer (talk) 13:14, 30 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
The Holy Sepulchre article is already too large according to Wikipedia guidelines. JASpencer (talk) 13:14, 30 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Floor mosaic

edit

This is a modern creation, from the 20th century (very obviously so), not the 12th century (which idiot tourist photos found on the web seem to label it as from). I wonder what, if anything, was destroyed to make way for it? Tiptoethrutheminefield (talk) 00:40, 12 January 2016 (UTC)Reply