Talk:Chaotic Trading Card Game

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Hangon edit

The reason I created the article is so that it may focus on the Chaotic trading card game specifically, as well as provide the information on the rules and background of the game. I am sorry if I can't meet the standards for an average article as I only can provide raw information with only mediocre organization. Also, there aren't many "good" sources for this game. If anyone please help me on improving this article!Worlder 17:11, 29 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

OKAY more npov edit

I'll add a critism section for the moment, to even it out a bit. There is a bit of cristism.

But it can be rewritten, it just takes time. And what do you expect if it's an actual product that people sell; you have to give the reasons why people like it don't you. But I suppose it may seem a bit biased, if there were more people contributing maybe it could be more NPOV. 77.99.107.117 15:10, 20 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

So you don't think that the Magic: the Gathering or Pokemon Trading Card Game articles are biased or advertising?77.99.107.117 15:13, 20 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Online Game Infobox edit

I think it should be added as Chaotic is an online game, and that's a major part of it. Though, it'd be better in the Online Game section, so I'll add it there, people who want information on the Online Game would want to look at it. I'm not sure why it was unneccesary, but it does look awkward where it was before.TheDalek 01:50, 21 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Evening. I'm here to mention about the bits that are going on. I'm in the game myself and so far the game itself is starting simple and quick to the point.

In beta testing, it's so far 1 creature against 1 creature to test the system before applying mugic and locations. They also let battle gear slide too. and where I saw one of the latest ones there it was covered with a kind of image that blocked out the card itself with a chaotic, enter the game, image on it.

1.) I think they're trying to make sure that the game itself works with simplistic programs to keep slow.

2.) there are still images they have need to put up so they can properly be shown.

3.) they are still constructing the website where all the games happen so updates will be given out to each player.

I wish to have this left up here so that people can understand the current changes, edits, fix ups, and programming that they are working on. Basically they just wanted to get the players started on the game. It must be a really complicated game to go through all this. Mialover730 09:51, 27 October 2007 (UTC)Reply


Update: So far no sign of any updates. They fixed the problem with baron beyond's avatar not showing and lately the other cards are set up. It is still in the 1 vs 1 stage and no mugic or location selections have been made yet. They just ran into some snags so far so they are clearing it up after the thanks giving fiasco with the workers on days off. Least it's working. Mialover730 (talk) 12:42, 29 November 2007 (UTC)Reply


Update: They're finally moving to the 3v3 in beta testing today. I'm more welcome to announce they are working on the way it shall be constructed. Ponderously, the construct deck section has yet to properly set up a way of using 3 creatures in an army yet. This is a first to use and figure, thusly telling that things will be QUITE interesting to see how they figure THIS problem out. See ya soon on further beta testing information. Mialover730 (talk) 12:42, 29 November 2007 (UTC)Reply


Update: More news from your beta tester in the game. Seems like they started using locations in the games. I been noticing a problem with the Chaotic pad with the difference between auto fights and normal challenges made. Maybe they're gonna work on what happens that's making the games freeze up by accident soon. Beta testing is going well, trading system is going fine, and Cards are being sent out to only select few places on the US map. I don't have cards like that on my block so I'm out of luck on collecting new cards. I still move on with electronic cards though.

But it brings up an INTERESTING question. If you have the card AND the electronic card of it, then what would happen if you kept the normal card but not the electronic card, or the electronic card but not the real card? Would make things PRETTY hard to keep track of your real life and online collection. So I forgot to mention they have a collection section on the website to help ya keep track of what ya have and what ya need. My advice, get attack cards and creatures that properly match together for a strategy... More news later on when the scene developes. Mialover730 (talk) 16:57, 14 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Removed reference? edit

A reference to http://www.chaoticgameplus.com/chaotic_blog_07_06_24_informationsheet.htm was removed. (diff) Was this intentional? If it was why? That site is still there and contains information backing up the claims made in the article. --Ⓔfitu (Ⓣalk) 06:31, 14 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Consider on-line play as if it was still in Beta edit

Perhaps it should be mentioned that the on-line site is extremely buggy right now, especially when trying to build an army. Cards constantly get lost or the system does not allow them to be placed into the army or playmat, due to bugs. Fortunatelly, such losses are temporary and an exit/re-enter resolves the issue. Also, the fact that cards need to be dragged one at a time to create an army in a very laborious fashion makes this a long and drawn out process. In all, army formation should have been integrated into the Chaotic Pad, instead of forcing players to do it on the web site. That combined with the pad's inability to automatically log-in each time it is launched, makes the whole thing a royal pain.

On top of all of this, for those of us running the pad or using the web site on a high resolution monitor, the inability to zoom/scale the window make it very difficult to see card detail and symbols, even after zooming in on a card. 24.13.203.238 (talk) 14:30, 4 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image copyright problem with Image:Chaotic logo.png edit

The image Image:Chaotic logo.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --21:12, 19 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Rarity symbols edit

This article needs to keep simple wnough to be easily read by any casual reader. If it is one specific card or set in which the expansion symbols are a little different, it may be better to leave it out of the article all together, to keep it simple and understandable. I do not play this game, and as an outsider, I can see the point of view of other outsiders who would easily get confused if you said something like "rares are gold, except in zenith when they are yellow, or dawn of the era when they are bronze" (especially when gold, yellow, and bronze are very similar colors). Also, since no one has explained previously in the article what zenith is, that would be especially confusing.Mathman1550 (talk) 16:35, 22 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

True, but to some people who may go here to look if the got a dawn of perim (DOP) booster, they may not understand what that is, and may believe it to be fake (talk)

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Chaotic Trading Card Game. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:03, 19 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Unsafe Link edit

The link to the 'Chaotic website' in the Demo Decks section is redirecting to malware sites: http://www.chaoticcode.com/dawnofperim

I removed the link but wanted to leave a note in case someone reverts it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.142.149.99 (talk) 16:31, 13 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Chaotic Trading Card Game. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:11, 2 August 2017 (UTC)Reply