Talk:Chantilly, Virginia

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Blog vs "national news" edit

      • Chantilly made national news for killing hundreds of stray cats. ***

An estimated 200 feral cats at a trailer park in Chantilly, VA were trapped and euthanized. Sgt. Andrew Sanderson of the county police department’s animal services division said that "There is nothing legally holding them back. They have every legal right to trap on their property.” (Source: http://www.itchmo.com/) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.93.77.7 (talk) 02:31, 27 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

The link is a blog (not a reliable source), and there's no cite for "national news" Tedickey (talk) 10:07, 27 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Origin of name edit

Any relation to the famous (and undoubtedly original) town of Chantilly in France? There's a beautiful castle there in which it is said the "Chantilly cream" was invented one night for a dinner desert which the King of France was attending. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.193.22.40 (talk) 16:08, 7 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

I found no reliable source for this, but took a look and found a reliable source for a different origin Tedickey (talk) 16:24, 7 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
The source notes that it was likely named for the home of Richard Henry Lee, which was in Westmoreland County, Virginia. Some digging would be needed to determine the source of its name, etc. Tedickey (talk) 16:44, 7 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

NRO hq? edit

There is no source for this. The linked topic doesn't provide that information. Some searching finds that there is an "Office of Public Affairs" at an address on the boundary between Chantilly and Centreville. Lacking a primary source identifying Chantilly as NRO headquarters -- and a noticeable absence of topicality -- that should be trimmed back to its original state. Readers don't need random cut/paste to clutter up a lede. TEDickey (talk) 01:08, 26 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

We can revisit this if someone gets around to cleaning up the topic. TEDickey (talk) 01:11, 27 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Town? edit

A "Town" (or city or whatever) has a specific meaning, which Chantilly appears to lack. A suitable WP:RS is required. TEDickey (talk) 10:09, 26 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Also of course (see the map), "westernmost" likewise appears nonfactual. Noting that a majority of the recent changes have no reliable source, some trimming would improve the topic TEDickey (talk) 10:13, 26 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Repeating - take a look at the map. It would be interesting to see a reliable source which supports "westernmost". TEDickey (talk) 01:09, 27 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Map? edit

It is impossible to state with the map used as reference 3 what the boundaries of the CDP are. In particular, note that the black area extends off the map and likely denotes abutting CDPs not identified. TEDickey (talk) 10:08, 27 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Zipcode vs CDP edit

Zipcode is unrelated to CDP. Keep in mind that the Post Office (which defines zip-codes based on its ease of delivery) is not the Census Bureau (which uses a different methodology). So those sources are irrelevant. Likewise, Wikipedia is not a reliable source, and cannot be used for that purpose. TEDickey (talk) 00:02, 28 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Repeatedly adding sources which are known to be irrelevant is a form of vandalism. The statement in discussion is whether South Riding is no longer a CDP but has become subsumed into Chantilly. TEDickey (talk) 00:49, 28 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Furthermore, making personal attacks on my talk page is not a way to demonstrate that you have addressed any of the article concerns. TEDickey (talk) 12:11, 28 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

South Riding edit

None of the links used as sources for the comment about South Riding are plausible; more than one additionally fails verification TEDickey (talk) 12:35, 12 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Chantilly, Virginia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:31, 19 November 2016 (UTC)Reply