Talk:Chaim Rapoport
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
A new article has been written on the temp page. Please move it over.
Some concerns with current version
editThree concerns:
- 1. Discuss on talk page, please, don't revert each other. For the recent restore of a large section on Chabad, I'm curious why the IP says that a source is not needed. Reliable sources are needed to support pretty much everything in WP. Re: Chaim Rapoport
- 2. The section on the abuse case is too long and disproportionate. Doesn't needs such a long block quote. A few sentences paraphrase would suffice.
- 3. There is some wording that tends to pass judgment, positive or negative, in a way that goes beyond WP:NPOV. I may make some sample adjustments. For example: "Rapoport is widely recognised as the only serious Torah scholar to have written comprehensively about homosexuality from an Orthodox perspective." In order to say "widely recognized" and "only serious" -- which seem like a biased POV -- we need reliable sources that assert this.
Hope this is useful and you don't mind my speaking up. HG | Talk 11:23, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
Serious issues in this article
editI'm going to take on addressing some of the issues in this article. I've removed some POV and irrelevant material, but also some pretty hefty BLP contraventions. For anyone not familiar with our policies, WP:BLP is a cornerstone of Wikipedia and we take it very seriously. If material that contravenes BLP is inserted or reinserted, we'll have to look at protecting the page and/or blocking accounts. --Dweller (talk) 12:32, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Chaim Rapoport. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071231174438/http://www.traditiononline.org:80/news/article.cfm?id=100961 to http://www.traditiononline.org/news/article.cfm?id=100961
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:03, 19 November 2016 (UTC)