Talk:Chadwick Boseman/GA1

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Kingsif in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 14:41, 17 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 14:41, 17 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Infobox and lead edit

  • Add a year date after Deep Azure.
  • It's a play, they don't have a fixed date. It premiered in 2005 but there have been other performances. Kingsif (talk) 21:45, 24 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Infobox and lead prose looks good.

Early life and education edit

  • Remove the comma after "textile factory".
  • Done, added one earlier in the sentence - grammar because of "and" build-up. Kingsif (talk) 21:47, 24 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Add a comma after "Limba people from Sierra Leone".
  • Several of his plays need year dates.
  • Remove the comma after "write and direct".
  • No, it's needed ("and" build-up again). Kingsif (talk) 21:47, 24 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Career edit

  • Add a comma after "Company of New York".
  • Year dates.
  • Remove the comma after "Company in Chicago".
  • "or impression" → "nor impression"
  • "highest grossing" → "highest-grossing"
  • In Both films were the highest grossing of the year they were released, with Endgame going on to become the highest-grossing film of all time. -? If so, no: "highest-grossing" is the adjective, which isn't what "highest grossing" in the first clause is being used for. Kingsif (talk) 21:58, 24 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "of their" → "about their"
  • Remove the comma after "before taking the role".
  • Remove the comma after "opening lines".
  • No to these, too. In the first instance it is introducing another primary clause (there's much more information after the "but"), in the second it is used to indicate the next clause applies to the subject of the previous clause ("given a nod") rather than simply continuing to describe the "opening lines". Grammar is an art. Kingsif (talk) 21:58, 24 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Appraisal and legacy edit

  • "embodying character" should be plural.
  • No it shouldn't. Regardless of how many characters he played, that is a singular skill. Each character has character, and being able to embody that concept is the skill. "Embodying characters" is just "acting". Kingsif (talk) 22:00, 24 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Personal life edit

  • This section looks good.

Illness and death edit

  • "for creation" → "for the creation"

Filmography edit

  • For The Glades, does Facebook need to be cited?
  • It's his official Facebook, so akin to a press release, and it's used for the episode title. Kingsif (talk) 22:02, 24 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
Can a more reliable (secondary) source such as this be used instead? Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 22:15, 24 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Playwright edit

  • Table looks good.

Awards and honors edit

  • This section also looks good.

References edit

  • Archive all archivable sources (either manually with the help of this and this, or with this tool).
  • You'll be pleased to know everything is already archived! (At least, it's not been long since I last ran IAbot, but I've run it again) Kingsif (talk) 22:43, 24 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Add a correct title, author, and overall parameters to the reference in the infobox.
  • What? Even that article says it's just called "Deadline" and the Hollywood part is web branding. Kingsif (talk) 22:43, 24 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • There is a copy of the reference titled "The 'Black Panther' Revolution" (recite instead).
  • Mark references from Forbes with "|url-access=limited".
  • Mark references from Los Angeles Times with "|url-access=limited".
  • Mark references from The New Republic with "|url-access=limited".
  • Mark references from The New York Time with "|url-access=limited".
  • Mark references from The New Yorker with "|url-access=limited".
  • Mark references from Rolling Stone with "|url-access=limited".
  • Mark references from Times with "|url-access=limited".
  • Mark references from Vanity Fair with "|url-access=limited".
  • Mark references from Vulture with "|url-access=limited".
  • Mark references from The Washington Post with "|url-access=limited".
  • Mark references from Wall Street Journal or The Wall Street Journal with "|url-access=subscription".
  • Not a requirement, but done all of these. Kingsif (talk) 22:43, 24 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • The second reference after "Carolyn (Mattress)" needs to be properly cited.
  • Fix the four references titled "Archived copy".
  • NPR.orgNPR
  • The second reference after "had attended" is missing a website.
  • The reference after "too many saints" is missing a website.
  • Republic World is not a reliable source.
  • It kind of is for this kind of social thing (or at least it is often used for such), but since there are many references there it's easy to remove. Kingsif (talk) 22:43, 24 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Done. And thanks for the effort in compiling this! Kingsif (talk) 22:43, 24 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • The reference after "the same day" is missing a website.
  • The text "Nikkolas Smith verified Instagram account" is not necessary.
  • NME | Music, Film, TV, Gaming & Pop Culture NewsNME
  • The reference for Rhyme Deferred in #Playwright needs to be properly cited.
  • The reference for Hieroglyphic Graffiti in #Playwright is missing a website.
  • Optional, but linking websites would be helpful to future readers.

Progress edit

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  

Overall:
Pass/Fail:  

  ·   ·   ·  
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.