This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
Latest comment: 6 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Joe Roe per WP:GEOLAND, we cannot use a census tract to establish notability. The translated title of the PDF you used to support removal of the PROD reads: Second GENERAL census of POPULATION and HABITAT. It is not an acceptable source. We can do one of two things - you self-revert deletion of the PROD, and if not, then I can take it to AfD. I prefer to let you make the choice. Atsme📞📧 15:34, 16 November 2017 (UTC)Reply
@Atsme: I wasn't suggesting the PDF source established notability, just that it attested that Chadra was a variant spelling (alongside Cheddra). Here are some more sources for the existence of the place: [1][2][3][4][5]. I don't think a PROD is appropriate at this point, but I'm not sure if it meets WP:GEOLAND either. Feel free to take it to AfD. – Joe (talk) 16:42, 16 November 2017 (UTC)Reply
Thanks, Joe Roe. The more I think about it, and after looking at additional sources using Chedra instead of Chadra, it is a populated settlement with some geographic significance. I zoomed in on Google maps, and saw a rather substantial housing development. Atsme📞📧 18:32, 16 November 2017 (UTC)Reply
