Talk:Chadbourne & Parke

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

This page reads more like advertising literature, than a discussion on the law firm, and example is the following, right at the top of the article. I would argue that if it wasn't for the age of this firm, this article should be deleted.

"With its global network of attorneys, Chadbourne is positioned to offer clients a full range of legal services on virtually all matters affecting them, both within the United States and internationally. In addition to its United States work, the firm has established substantial practices in Western, Central and Eastern Europe, Turkey, the Middle East and Latin America." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.18.212.57 (talk) 23:52, 5 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chadbourne & Parke. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:09, 18 November 2016 (UTC)Reply