Talk:Ceremonial mace

modern mace

It says in the history that maces went out with heavy armour.. i thought that they were still in use in WWI trenches.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.151.194.59 (talk) 13:35, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Old Cleanup Archive

Taken from the old Cleanup entry…Archived by HopeSeekr of xMule (Talk) 15:16, 9 August 2005 (UTC)

• Ceremonial mace - Needs to be organized and presented in a more article-like fashion. Some headings, an introduction, etc. -- MatthewDBA 11:17, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

• The commas are killing me - extensive grammar rewrite required -- MatthewDBA 11:17, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

More info

Exhibition - Medieval Maces: Power and Ceremony (University of St Andrews), History of the Mace (Parliament Of Singapore). Hope this might help. Komitsuki (talk) 12:45, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

The Sergeant at Arms & Mace, The Mace. Komitsuki (talk) 14:23, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Ceremonial mace. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090119063225/http://uk.news.yahoo.com:80/4/20090115/tuk-mace-protest-mp-suspended-dba1618.html to http://uk.news.yahoo.com/4/20090115/tuk-mace-protest-mp-suspended-dba1618.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:27, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ceremonial mace. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130619110926/http://www.general-council.ed.ac.uk/mace.htm to http://www.general-council.ed.ac.uk/mace.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:03, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Origins in England and France? What about Mesopotamia? Egypt? Byzantium?

Maybe the British and French ceremonial maces are an independent evolution of the idea, but they had ample contact with Byzantium, so this seems doubtful. And at very least maces evolved beyond practical tools to become symbolic of royal authority and power in ancient Mesopotamia and Egypt, long before the "origin" of this symbolism in England and France.

As noted in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stela_of_Ashurnasirpal_II, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stela_of_Shamshi-Adad_V, http://museum.imj.org.il/imagine/galleries/viewItemE.asp?case=9&itemNum=198926 , http://www.ucl.ac.uk/sargon/downloads/finkel_reade_za86_1996.pdf (p. 5), http://www.britishmuseum.org/research/collection_online/collection_object_details.aspx?objectId=367057&partId=1 , etc.

Byzantine ceremonial mace and spread of ceremonial maces to cultures influenced by Byzantium: https://books.google.com/books?id=KamgCgAAQBAJ&pg=PA107&lpg=PA107&dq=byzantine+ceremonial+mace&source=bl&ots=_449XPsqoR&sig=mn8lFBzZslqlnYApQNDVNDxg1UU&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjUyOqM4f7aAhWlrVkKHeRiD48Q6AEIXjAK#v=onepage&q&f=false

http://amm.sanok.pl/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/VII.1_DAmato.pdf (Author on p. 25 discusses Byzantine "command maces," stating that the mace as a symbol of authority originated "ancient times in the East" and passed from the East to the Byzantines and via them to the West.)

Inclined to modify the section ascribing invention of the ceremonial mace to the British and French, unless anyone objects. I'm aware that there are British published sources ascribing the invention to themselves, so I'm thinking it is more appropriate to qualify the article's current claims than to delete them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 40.138.155.2 (talk) 22:52, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

I have made edits in general line with the above, except that I ended up omitting any suggestion that the English/French ceremonial maces were the first or that they were an independent invention. Various sources that I consulted made that seem totally implausible, and it seemed if I left it in as an alternate interpretation the article would end up implying that the parliamentary history sources are full of it (not my intent). So I just split that section into subsections by era and left the suggestion, backed by sources, that the later ceremonial maces were likely influenced by earlier ones rather than invented ex nihilo. Aithiopika (talk) 02:36, 12 December 2018 (UTC)