Talk:Ceprano Man

new species

I wouldn't say this could be a new species, more likely a memeber of Homo erectus or H. heidelbergensis in Italy.--Quena@sympatico.ca 06:29, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

See Mikko's Phylogeny Archive for it being listed as a species. I'm removing the POV tag. - UtherSRG (talk) 18:22, 23 November 2005 (UTC)

Reference

Why are we referencing 'et al' in the info box, when the other authors/researchers aren't listed anywhere else in this article? Shouldn't we reference all entirely, not just Mallegni. ClEeFy 12:37, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

New data

The Stem Species of Our Species: A Place for the Archaic Human Cranium from Ceprano, ItalyBulwersator (talk) 17:35, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Homo cepranensis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151222111333/http://anthropology.ua.edu/blogs/dssimpson1/2015/10/22/homo-cepranensis-still-its-own-species/ to http://anthropology.ua.edu/blogs/dssimpson1/2015/10/22/homo-cepranensis-still-its-own-species/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:52, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Updating Overall Format

I think this article could do with some updating. The format is very dense and would benefit heavily from different sections even if they are tiny. Differentiating information would be useful and having a detailed Lead is important. I might come back to this when I have a bit of free time, but anyone is free to jump in before me.--Aerradin (talk) 19:29, 16 April 2020 (UTC)