Talk:Centrifugal gun

Military history: Technology / Weaponry Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force

Firearms Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

1830s edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This suggest there were experiments in the 1830s as well, but I can't find a WP:RS mentioning those. Someone not using his real name (talk) 01:17, 3 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

DREAD edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Since science journalists don't count for much these days, I'm leaving this link here. Someone not using his real name (talk) 02:16, 3 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Dahlgren's centrifugal gun edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I tried to find more about that, because Dahlgren was quite notable even during his lifetime, so I expected more info can be found rather easily. But I wasn't able to find anything... Although Robert V. Bruce is normally a reliable source, I wonder if he was wrong about this; his book Lincoln and the Tools of War, although published by an academic publisher, does not employ footnotes/endnotes... Someone not using his real name (talk) 22:36, 7 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Add topic