This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article was accepted on 12 February 2015 by reviewer Ktr101 (talk·contribs).
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
@Josve05a:, I am unable to process your RevDel request without more information. Your request is to delete all edits prior to your last, however a complete rewrite was not done and this would list you as the only author for content you did not create. Either the entire page can be deleted, or it will need to be rewritten or stubbed first. Please use {{ping}} if replying to me here. — xaosfluxTalk 20:49, 1 February 2015 (UTC)Reply
@Xaosflux: That is not true. If you revdel only the edits (revisions) the username should still be left, all in accordance with TOU and the licenses. It will not list me as the only authror. See e.g. [1] (which you revdeled). All it does is prevent people to see how the old versions looked like and see what exactly the different people wrote, which is not needed for attribuion. (t) Josve05a (c) 21:10, 1 February 2015 (UTC)Reply
Agree, will only suppress the text, not the rest--however this is at least messy--as only admins will be able to determine where the edits came from if there are other issues to research. Agree that the copyvio stuff needs to be redacted though, processing now. — xaosfluxTalk 21:16, 1 February 2015 (UTC)Reply
.jpg)
