Talk:Centralized government

Use of de facto

The intro paragraph currently says "is exerted or coordinated by a de facto political executive..." Why the use of "de facto" here? I think that for clarity's sake you could just take that away and say political executive. However, before I make the change I wanted to check if anyone could explain the logic behind saying de facto. —Zujine|talk 04:21, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

The individual is in actuality a political executive, though it isn't officially established. At least that's what it seems to be explaining. It would appear to be a vital piece of information to some people if taken in that context. But "de facto" can be taken in many ways, therefore it would probably be more efficient to just restate the sentence. As you said, for clarity's sake, so you don't have to read up on the political uses for the expression. ~thelittlegumnut ^[talk] 10:44, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

I will remove it because it is confusing.--Jack Upland (talk) 02:31, 7 January 2020 (UTC) The UTC of a certain article pertaining to centralized government has no political suggestion except the fact that O YUH is not irrelavent.

Original research and questionable content

This article has very little citations, and the content is questionable. Normally, centralised government is contrasted with federalised government, but this suggests that a federal government is a centralised government. This is very hard to understand, very vague, and very unhelpful.--Jack Upland (talk) 02:40, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Bst

What is management 106.223.138.109 (talk) 17:03, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

History

Title taking that existed in centralised states 41.190.3.168 (talk) 20:17, 6 July 2022 (UTC)