Talk:Central London Railway/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 10:48, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Starting review. Pyrotec (talk) 10:48, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Initial comments

I've had a quick read through and this article appears to be at or about GA level (or possibly higher). I will now do a detail review, which might take a day or so to complete. During that time I will mostly be highlighting "problems", if any - so this is a somewhat "negative" stage in the overall process. Pyrotec (talk) 17:00, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Overall summary

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

A comprehensive and fascinating article.

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   Well referenced.

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   Well referenced. Its the first time I've seen the London Gazette used as a cite in wikipedia transport article, but it is entirely valid as a means of WP:Verifiability.

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   Well illustrated - the maps are particularly helpful.

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

This article is a possible WP:FAC and I have no hesitation in awarding GA-status. Congratulations on your acheivements in producing a fine article. Pyrotec (talk) 10:41, 6 April 2010 (UTC)