Talk:Central Asians in ancient Indian literature

	Literature portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

India: History Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance).

Central Asia Mid‑importance

	Asia portal Central Asians in ancient Indian literature is part of WikiProject Central Asia, a project to improve all Central Asia-related articles. This includes but is not limited to Afghanistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia, Tajikistan, Tibet, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Xinjiang and Central Asian portions of Iran, Pakistan and Russia, region-specific topics, and anything else related to Central Asia. If you would like to help improve this and other Central Asia-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.Central AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Central AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Central AsiaCentral Asia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ethnic groups

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Ethnic groups open tasks:

Here are some open WikiProject Ethnic groups tasks:

Meta-tasks:
- Place the {{Ethnic groups}} template on the talk page of articles within the scope of this project.
- Resolve the disparity in importance rankings among different ethnic groups
Articles about ethnic groups that currently have issues needing resolution:
Start an article:
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groups/Article requests

Feel free to edit this list or discuss these tasks.

[Untitled] edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Bedfore placing non-sensical templates like this one in this article, come and discuss its relevance with reference to this article. This is vandalism.)

Sze cavalry01 19:01, 23 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Please be civil and assume good faith here. An article about ancient India is within the scope of the India Wikiproject. Please do not revert the template. - Ganeshk (talk) 07:13, 30 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Fascinating article; lots of information that I didn't know about. Wish we went slightly easy on the Sanskrit terms though; was a tad protracted following the description in parts!

Aryan Invasion/Migration theory

This article is written, assuming that Aryan Invasion/Migration theory is true. AIT/AMT is a controversial theory and its validity is subject to debate. AIT was used as a propaganda by the British to justify their colonization of India. There are many counter arguments to this theory. I hope this article is revised to present an even-sided picture of the topic, rather than just passing off the unproven AIT/AMT as fact. Swami Vivekananda, one of the most revered Hindu Gurus and an expert in Indology, disagrees with this theory. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kkjkkj (talk • contribs) 21:23, 11 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Sourcing edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

We are not qualified to interpret ancient primary documents, many of which refer to regions and peoples in inconsistent ways and which mix fact with fiction. I do understand that this article is about those literary sources but we really should be using modern secondary sources that discuss them. - Sitush (talk) 17:24, 6 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic