Talk:Central African Republic Bush War

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Quinnerwinner12 in topic Fix the way this article lists sources

I don't personally see this as being on the level of a civil war (at least not now). Might be better to retitle this. Everyking 01:32, 13 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

What does UFDR stand for? I'm working on a wikinews article right now and I have no idea wha it stands for. íslenskur fellibylur #12 (samtal) 12:35, 13 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Aha! It means Union of Democratic Forces for Unity. Wait, that's UDFU. Now I'm confused. íslenskur fellibylur #12 (samtal) 13:07, 13 November 2006 (UTC)Reply
Oh, UDFR is french. íslenskur fellibylur #12 (samtal) 13:09, 13 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Crystal ball edit

As of November 15, 2006, this article was saying that CAR insurgents were claiming that they had captured a certain locality on November 20, 2006. I do not know what day this claim was made, but it was not made on November 20. Bigturtle 18:23, 15 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

fixed, my bad. íslenskur fellibylur #12 (samtal) 01:39, 16 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Sections edit

I think this needs more sections than "Events", but I'm not sure what sections to add, or if i knew what sections, what info that exists to put in them. If there is no other info, then I think we should just remove the "Events" header. So? íslenskur fellibylur #12 (samtal) 15:17, 23 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Bot report : Found duplicate references ! edit

In the last revision I edited, I found duplicate named references, i.e. references sharing the same name, but not having the same content. Please check them, as I am not able to fix them automatically :)

  • "reuters" :
    • [http://today.reuters.com/News/CrisesArticle.aspx?storyId=L17141918 "Central Africa's Bozize asks EU to push for UN troops"], ''[[Reuters]]'', [[November 17]], [[2006]]
    • [http://today.reuters.co.uk/news/CrisesArticle.aspx?storyId=L10708333&WTmodLoc=World-R5-Alertnet-4 World Crises | Reuters.co.uk<!-- Bot generated title -->]

DumZiBoT (talk) 11:37, 12 August 2008 (UTC)Reply


Possible copyright problem edit

 

This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. MkativerataCCI (talk) 21:14, 8 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Merger Proposal edit

A merger proposal discussion has started at Talk:2012 Central African Republic rebellion#Merge with Central African Republic Bush War Keitsist (talk) 17:27, 31 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Cause? edit

Article fails to mention what was the cause and the motivation of the rebellion that started this war. --94.253.206.109 (talk) 09:20, 7 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Caused by many factions struggling for power and resources and retribution spirals between factions like seleka and the anti balaka, the topic still needs heavy research. --CR055H41RZ (talk) 22:50, 29 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:37, 28 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Fix the way this article lists sources edit

There's one section called "Citations" where most of the sources are. Some of those just lead to another section called "References". This is not how most articles list sources. Most articles have one section called "References" where all the sources are. They are also numbered like the citation section in this article. That should be the way this article lists sources ~~ Quinnerwinner12 (talk) 19:04, 31 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.