Talk:Centaurea calcitrapa
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Centaurea calcitrapa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110718171601/http://www.andreapieroni.eu/Pieroni%20et%20al.,%202002d.pdf to http://www.andreapieroni.eu/Pieroni%20et%20al.,%202002d.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:42, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Uncited distribution section and controversy therein edit
So an IP editor just made this edit. I have no idea what the usual procedure on WP is for this, and we can't just fall back on the sources because there aren't any. Invasive Spices (talk) 19:43, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Invasive Spices: As it clearly wasn't a typo fix, as suggested in the edit summary, my normal reaction might be simply to revert the edit, explaining why. But if there aren't sources, my next step is to go look for some, which shouldnt be too hard. Try this for starters. What really needs fixing is the lack of clarity between its native range and its established (introduced) range. Sorry I can't offer more input on this right now. Nick Moyes (talk) 22:34, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Ok done. Invasive Spices (talk) 20:45, 6 March 2021 (UTC)