The article calls those effected by the signal as infected - why?

edit

As per my title, it is believed that these "Phoners" have received telepathic/audio signals from cell phones to alter their behavoir, IF this is the case and this infliction cannot be passed on, then they are NOT infected as the article suggests more than once. Whilst calling them "infected" does help the reader to more easily identify these are the bad guys, it's not accurate. 81.174.158.84 (talk) 01:20, 1 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

You literally could not be more wrong. 1) They are infected. 2) They can infect others. 3) You can be infected with things that you can’t pass on. 222.153.35.136 (talk) 23:33, 20 January 2024 (UTC)Reply