Talk:Cefalù Cathedral

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cefalù Cathedral. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061027230428/http://www.regione.sicilia.it/beniculturali/dirbenicult/duomoCefalu/storia.htm to http://www.regione.sicilia.it/beniculturali/dirbenicult/duomoCefalu/storia.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:01, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Architectural style, problematic IP edits

Hello @Johnbod, Pro Regnum Siciliæ, Mike Peel, Parkwells, and Soupforone: Pinging you as the most recent editors on this article. I've been encountering some difficulty with an IP editor here lately (an oft-blocked IP long known for edit-warring), and, rather than addressing the issue unilaterally, I'd like to get some input from you all who likely have more expertise than I regarding this church. Thanks in advance for your input. Eric ^talk 21:13, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Buona sera, collaboratore anonimo. As I suggested on your talkpage, please read the Description section of the article, and note the links in the See also section. Regarding your above comment: I am not trying to promote my own original view, as you would no doubt comprehend if you took a minute to look at the revision history of the article. Eric ^talk 23:34, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Please also look at the chronology of the Talk page because a user tries to sabotage it.--2.232.70.45 (talk) 00:51, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Because of further disruption from the IP editor, I have now posted on ANI. Eric ^talk 01:53, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

I think it makes sense to use the title and architectural style as discussed in the UNESCO World Heritage Site and related documentation. While not every editor may be familiar with this, it is a readily identifiable and available source, based on professional documentation. Parkwells (talk) 22:26, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

I moved my argument after the sabotage attempt [1] --2.232.70.45 (talk) 14:02, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

this is an encyclopedia not a blog ... we need to consider academic studies ... scientific studies and not personal interpretation. I think this--2.232.70.45 (talk) 14:08, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Architectural style = "Norman-Arab-Byzantine culture" or "Norman architecture"?

It is Norman "cluniancense" Romanesque architecture (as sources and unesco document cited); there is no identification with that name "Norman-Arab-Byzantine culture style"... it is non-existent in historiography...but not for Eric . Look from chronology ... this is the problem.--2.232.70.45 (talk) 22:43, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Please also look at the chronology of the Talk page because a user tries to sabotage it.--2.232.70.45 (talk) 00:51, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Avoid sabotaging the discussion --2.232.70.45 (talk) 14:02, 17 February 2018 (UTC)