Talk:Cedarcroft, Baltimore

Linking from the wikipedia article on Cedarcroft Area to the Cedarcroft School website

After reviewing the guidelines and directives of your encyclopedia, it appears that historical material and photos from our website www.cedarcroftschool.com would enrich the information that you have online. Please do look to our website and let us know if such a link from your article to our website is possible.71.179.193.104 (talk) 15:22, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

Clarification needed

The following paragraph makes not sense and seems to be spread between two distinct time eras:

In 1977 the Cedarcroft Maintenance Corporation’s covenants remained firm. Plans, color schemes and renovations were to be submitted to the group for approval. Price floors were also introduced. Each house was required to cost at least $6000, yet most selling prices ranged from $40,000 to $60,000. Due to the larger size and higher values of Cedarcroft houses, the neighborhood saw a sizable number of young family groups moving in. These family units most often included professionally employed husbands and wives, and children who attended area private schools such as Bryn Mawr.

I believe that each home in the area was required (in 1920s terms) to be built at a cost of $6,000. But at what point would they have crossed the $40,000 to $60,000 range? In the 1940s, 50s or 60s? Has the neighborhood always attracted professionally employed husbands with wives, or has it always attracted employed husbands and wives? Sjkoblentz (talk) 21:18, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

References

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Cedarcroft, Baltimore. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100227080915/http://www.cedarcroftbaltimore.com/ to http://www.cedarcroftbaltimore.com/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120211205256/http://www.cedarcroftbaltimore.com/services-1.htm to http://www.cedarcroftbaltimore.com/services-1.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120211205256/http://www.cedarcroftbaltimore.com/services-1.htm to http://www.cedarcroftbaltimore.com/services-1.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090105160136/http://www.nativitycedarcroft.org/history.htm to http://www.nativitycedarcroft.org/history.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:21, 1 August 2017 (UTC)