Talk:Cavalier King Charles Spaniel/GA1

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Casliber in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 19:38, 16 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Okay, I will begin reviewing the article and will make straightforward changes, comments below. You know the drill :) Casliber (talk · contribs) 19:38, 16 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

  • It is a friendly, affectionate breed which is good with children, cats and dogs of all sizes. Due to its spaniel heritage, however, it requires training to behave around smaller animals and pets such as hamsters and gerbils. - I'd reduce this to a single sentence on temperament and place further down the lead I think.
  • They have an instinct to chase pretty much anything that moves, and therefore should be kept on a leash when out in the street. - the challenge here is how to make it sound less like a pet manual. The aim would be to reword to state what happens when unleashed rather than urge readers to leash the dog :)
  • The term 'polygenic' is unusual - might be a plainer way of saying it.
  • It would be great to fill out the Popularity section with any figures (or even mention) available from other countries - Australia, South Africa, or Europe/South America etc. How worldwide is it?
  • It isn't clear whether Episodic Falling (EF) is specific to the breed from the text.
  • There are, however, exceptions to this situation - leaves me hanging....
  • World War II caused a drastic setback to the breed, with the vast majority of breeding stock destroyed because of the hardship. - what? leaves me hanging and wanting to know more (!)
  • Might be hard, but I think comparing health issues with the King Charles would be interesting if there is any discussion available.
  • Couldn't find a direct comparison, but I found what seems to be a definitive reference for King Charles/Toy Spaniel health issues, so added that instead and a line to the start of the health section. Miyagawa (talk) 23:21, 17 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Overall, fascinating read and potentially a great article. Be nice to get this one featured. Funny how sometimes articles come together well and sometimes they don't initially. Casliber (talk · contribs) 20:25, 17 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Okay, we are there. Casliber (talk · contribs) 11:17, 20 November 2009 (UTC)Reply